Last-Mile Logistics

Last-Mile Delivery Optimization — Why It's the Most Expensive and Most Important Part of Your Supply Chain

Capgemini puts last-mile delivery at up to 53% of total shipping costs. Here is where that money goes, which levers move it, and the one figure to measure first.

Updated 11 September 2026 · first published 27 April 2026 · 8 min read

Runink Logistics Operations Team

Last-Mile Delivery Optimization — Why It's the Most Expensive and Most Important Part of Your Supply Chain

What are the Key Takeaways from this Executive Summary?

Quick answer

The last mile is the most expensive leg of the journey. The Capgemini Research Institute puts it at up to 53% of total shipping costs. Three levers are available to most operations: re-plan routes during the day rather than the night before, move some parcels to staffed collection points, and use your own delivery history to flag the drops likely to fail before the van leaves. Which lever pays depends on one figure: how many of your deliveries needed a second attempt last quarter.
  • A failed delivery is two journeys. Both were paid for. Only one could have earned anything. This is usually the largest recoverable cost in the last mile.
  • Customer expectations have already moved. Tracking, narrow windows and same-day options are now the baseline, not a selling point.
  • The levers are well understood and do not need new infrastructure. Live re-routing, collection points, and reading your own failure history. What is missing in most operations is the measurement, not the tooling.

Why Does Last-Mile Delivery Consume Over Half of Total Shipping Costs?

Quick answer

Because the last mile has the most stops, the emptiest vehicles and the most things that can go wrong. A single full trailer becomes a hundred doorsteps. Each doorstep adds traffic, parking, an access code and the one thing nobody controls: whether the customer is in.

The maths is plain. Line-haul moves a lot of freight between two points, in near-full trucks, on a route that rarely changes. The middle mile runs hub to hub on a settled pattern.

The last mile breaks one consolidated load into dozens or hundreds of separate drops. Each drop brings traffic, a parking problem, a locked lobby, and an unknown: is anyone home?

The Capgemini Research Institute puts last mile at up to 53% of total shipping costs. Parcel volumes have grown since the pandemic, but drops per route in suburban and rural areas have not kept pace. Vans drive farther and deliver less per mile.

The World Economic Forum expects urban last-mile traffic to rise 36% by 2030 without intervention, adding 6 million tonnes of CO₂ worldwide.

For whoever runs delivery operations, this is not a nuisance. It is where the margin goes.


What Makes Failed Deliveries So Costly — And So Persistent?

Quick answer

A failed delivery is never one event. It takes route capacity, fuel and a driver’s time, earns nothing, and then does it all again on the re-attempt. It also costs dispatcher time and a customer service call, and the customer blames the carrier and the retailer rather than their own diary.

Start with the cost of one failure in your own operation. It is two journeys, plus the dispatcher’s time, plus the call. Most operations have never added those up.

The causes are well known. Bad address data. A window that is too wide or absent. No message to the recipient before the van arrives. No check that anyone will be there.

Many operations still treat all of that as friction that comes with the job. It is not. Each of those four causes can be measured, and each has a fix that does not need new vehicles.

The one number worth producing first: of last quarter’s deliveries, how many needed a second attempt, and what did that second journey cost you?


How Are Route Inefficiency and Driver Shortages Compounding the Problem?

Quick answer

Routes are planned the night before on historical averages, so they cannot account for today’s traffic, weather or late orders. At the same time drivers are hard to recruit and keep, so you cannot solve a slow route by adding vans. Every minute wasted on a route is a drop you do not make.

A route planned at 6pm yesterday looks efficient on paper. It meets today’s road closure and falls apart.

Most of a driver’s shift is spent in transit rather than delivering, and the exact share is something your telematics already knows. Pull last month: wheels-turning time against time at the stop. That ratio is the gap the planning is fighting, and it is worth having your own figure before anyone sells you an improvement to it.

Driver shortage makes every inefficiency worse. Recruitment is hard across North America and Europe, and turnover is high in dense urban markets. If you cannot add people, the only lever left is using the hours you have better.

City rules narrow the window further. Restricted delivery zones, low-emission zones, timed access to pedestrian streets and scarce kerb space all eat into the shift. A van on a central London or Manhattan route loses a large part of its day to access and parking, not to driving. Measure that share for your own routes before you buy anything to fix it.


How Can Dynamic Route Optimization and PUDO Networks Reduce Last-Mile Costs?

Quick answer

Live re-routing re-orders the remaining stops when something changes, so the plan tracks the day instead of last night. PUDO (pick-up/drop-off) points — lockers, shops, post offices — remove the customer-not-home failure entirely, because the parcel is handed to staff and the customer collects. One raises the value of each doorstep drop. The other takes the riskiest drops off the doorstep altogether.

Live re-routing is not faster planning. It is planning again during the day. A road closes, so the remaining stops are re-ordered. A customer says they will be out, so the slot moves.

Improvements are claimed for this, in percentages, by everyone selling routing software. Treat all of them as unmeasured until the measurement is yours: stops per route and fuel per drop, for one depot, for the month before and the month after. Those two numbers are in your own telematics and fuel-card data, and they settle the question for your network rather than for somebody’s average.

PUDO points attack a different cost. A parcel sent to a staffed collection point cannot fail because nobody was home — someone is always there to sign for it. Drops also cluster: one stop serves many parcels. For retailers with high return rates, the same points take returns back.

The two fit together. Live re-routing makes the doorstep drops worth more. PUDO takes the drops most likely to fail out of the van. Whether that trade works for you depends on your own failure rate and your own cost per attempt, which is why those two figures come before any tool choice.


Why Is Predictive Delivery Intelligence the Next Competitive Advantage?

Quick answer

Because it moves the decision earlier. Instead of learning that a drop failed, you use your own delivery history to flag the ones likely to fail while the parcel is still in the depot. Then you can send it to a collection point or book a confirmed window instead.

The better operations are not only planning routes. They are reading their own history before dispatch.

An address that has failed repeatedly is not a surprise. It is a record you already hold. The parcel can be routed to a nearby collection point, or the customer called for a confirmed window, before the driver loads the van.

The same history helps with capacity. A volume projection by postcode area, a few days ahead, lets you move vans, adjust shifts and book extra drivers before the spike lands rather than during it.

Two capabilities sit underneath all of this, and they are worth separating. One is demand forecasting — a volume projection by area, with the history it came from attached, so a planner can argue with it. The other is route optimization — the measured distance and travel time for a leg under current conditions, cheap enough to ask again after lunch. Runink FACE does both. Neither prints a saving next to the answer. The routing provider does not return one, and an invented figure beside two measured ones is how an estimate gets quoted back as a fact.


Conclusion

Quick answer

The last mile will stay the most expensive leg. The levers that move it — re-planning during the day, collection points, and reading your own failure history — are well understood. Which one pays for you depends on figures you already hold but probably have not added up.

The last mile is not going to get easier. Cities will get more congested, expectations will keep rising, and drivers will stay hard to hire.

But the levers are not exotic. Live re-routing, collection points and volume projection all run on data you already record. None of them needs new depots.

So the question for whoever runs delivery operations is which lever touches their actual cost. That turns on one figure most operations have never worked out: how many deliveries needed a second attempt last quarter, and what each of those second journeys cost. A failed first attempt is two journeys, and it is usually the largest recoverable item in the last mile. Talk to us if it would help to work that number out.



Sources

Last-Mile Delivery Route Optimization PUDO Customer Experience Delivery Costs Runink

All articles

Runink: Data You Can Trust. Decisions You Can Defend.

Runink FACE reads the logistics records you already hold, compares them against the rules that govern them, and drafts an action for the person who owns the decision. It runs on infrastructure you control.